How the Lender Underwrites
The lender does not lend against reported NAV at face value. They look through to gross assets, apply a 25 to 40% haircut for credit loss and illiquidity, subtract fund debt, and lend against the residual. Banks advance 5 to 12% of NAV. Specialist lenders go up to 30%, and as high as 50 to 75% through preferred equity on diversified mature portfolios.
Borrower and Portfolio Diligence
Underwriting does not stop at the fund. The lender also underwrites the borrower and the rest of their LP portfolio: KYC and AML, verified net worth, capital commitments, every other fund interest with reported NAV, concentration, side letter review, lien priority. The credit memo combines fund and borrower analysis before any number is committed.
This is what makes traditional LP loans expensive. The fund work is shared across deals at the same lender. The borrower work is bespoke every time. That is a meaningful share of the 30 to 60 hours per credit memo.
Structural Protections
| Protection | How It Works |
|---|
| DACA | Tri party agreement between borrower, lender, and depository bank. Distributions flow to a pledged account. On default, lender takes control within two business days. |
| GP Acknowledgment | The GP signs off on the lien and agrees to redirect distributions to the pledged account. |
| Administrator Reliance Letter | Fund administrator provides reports directly to lender: gross asset value, net asset value, leverage ratio, concentration. |
| Negative Pledge + UCC 1 | LP cannot pledge the interest elsewhere. Lender files a UCC 1 to perfect the security interest. |
Covenant Triggers
Fund leverage exceeds the agreed cap. NAV declines 20 to 25% over a rolling 12 month period. Single originator concentration exceeds 15 to 20%. Defaults exceed 5% of portfolio. Fund suspends redemptions. Monitored through the administrator's quarterly report.
Typical Terms
| Term | Typical Range |
|---|
| Advance rate | 5 to 50% of reported NAV |
| Coupon over base rate | SOFR + 400 to 600 basis points |
| Tenor | 12 to 24 months |
| Recourse | Full recourse to LP entity |
| Collateral | LP interest pledged via DACA |
| Enforcement | Cash sweep on distributions, then secondary sale of the interest |
| Minimum deal size | $5M to $15M |
Part 2: Where the Cost Sits
The structural protections work. The opportunity is in how they are delivered.
Origination Timeline
Simple deals with experienced counterparties close in a few weeks. Complex first time deals take 8 to 16 weeks. Fund screening, credit memo, five to seven legal documents negotiated across multiple parties, and closing. The GP acknowledgment alone adds 2 to 6 weeks. Roughly 40 to 50% of inquiries are declined at screening.
Cost Per Deal
Lender and borrower counsel bill $175K to $500K combined. Commitment fee runs 25 to 75 bps of facility size. Setup and filings add $5K to $15K. A simple repeat deal totals $150K to $250K, a complex first time deal $350K to $600K. This is why the minimum viable deal size is $5M to $15M and an LP with a $500K stake has no real option.
Non recourse structures cost more still. Extra legal provisions per deal, advance rates drop to 20 to 35%, and for smaller interests the legal cost can approach the loan amount.
Monitoring: Quarterly PDFs and Excel
The fund administrator sends capital account statements quarterly as a PDF, 45 to 90 days after quarter end. The credit analyst manually extracts NAV, computes LTV, and checks covenants. There is no API. A covenant breach may not surface until the next statement arrives.
Enforcement: Months, Sometimes Years
Detection happens 2 to 4 months stale, when the next quarterly statement arrives. Cure runs 10 to 30 days. Standstill runs another 15 to 30 days before remedies. Forced liquidation is rare because selling requires GP consent, a buyer, and a discount. Total time from breach to resolution: 30 to 90 days if the borrower cooperates, 6 to 18 months if they do not.
Part 3: How the Ravariant Pricing Engine Changes It
The structural protections do not change. What changes is how they are delivered. Ravariant runs a pricing engine that sets four outputs at origination and reprices them live: advance rate, dynamic margin threshold, coupon over base rate, and enforcement sequence.
Access at Genesis
Ravariant partners with the GP at fund launch. The GP gains a liquidity feature: invest in the fund and you can borrow against your interest from day one. That alignment gives Ravariant the administrator data feed, blanket GP consent, and cooperation on custody and enforcement. The GP is a distribution channel, not a counterparty.
Advance Rate
Traditional lenders set the advance rate per deal. Ravariant computes it once per fund template. The advance rate is the same for every borrower against that fund. A $500K loan and a $50M loan use the same number.
Dynamic Margin Threshold
Traditional lenders set a margin threshold once and do not adjust it until the next quarterly NAV. Ravariant reprices continuously using proxy baskets of correlated public assets. If the basket moves, the threshold adjusts for new borrowing. Existing loans are unaffected. The threshold is a pricing decision, not an enforcement trigger.
Coupon over Base Rate
Traditional LP loans price at SOFR plus 400 to 600 bps. Most of the spread reflects the legal and operational cost of running that facility, not credit risk. Ravariant prices the coupon as a function of the fund template, the loan size, and the live margin threshold. With the template reused, what remains is the credit component plus a clearing margin.
How the pieces fit together
Fund Administrator
Reports leverage, concentration, defaults
GP
Signs compliance certificate certifying accuracy
Ravariant pricing engine
Sets advance rate, dynamic margin threshold, coupon over base rate, and enforcement sequence at origination, then reprices live
↓ instructions
Third Party Custodian
Holds collateral, releases on trigger
collateral on breach →
← capital
↑ loan terms
Lender
Provides capital, receives distributions
↑ posts collateral
Borrower
LP interest holder
Traditional
Each connection is a separate
legal agreement. 3 to 6 months.
Ravariant
One template per fund.
Minutes. Near zero marginal cost.
Underwriting: Once Per Fund
When a fund is onboarded, Ravariant underwrites it once. That underwriting becomes a standardized loan template. Every borrower against that fund uses the same terms, the same triggers, the same enforcement sequence.
The 150 page LPA review happens once. The credit agreement is templated. The DACA, GP acknowledgment, and administrator arrangement are negotiated once and reused. GP consent that takes 2 to 6 weeks per LP per deal becomes a blanket consent.
Borrower Diligence: Standardized, Not Bespoke
The fund work standardizes per fund. The borrower work standardizes per borrower. KYC, net worth, and capital commitments come from a single onboarding flow that returns a verified profile reusable across every loan. The borrower's LP portfolio is registered once. Concentration and capital call exposure are computed by the system. The first loan carries the data collection. Every subsequent loan reuses the file.
Monitoring: Continuous, Not Quarterly
The administrator reports on the same schedule for every lender. Ravariant does not get the data faster. The difference is what happens when it arrives. The system processes the report automatically and checks every active loan against the fund at once. Between reports, proxy baskets fill the gap with a live signal. Administrator data is the anchor; the basket is the supplement.
Enforcement Sequence: Graduated, Not Binary
When a covenant breaches, the sequence agreed at origination runs automatically. Warning, cash sweep redirecting distributions to the lender, partial collateral release, then full release. The collateral sits with a third party custodian that executes releases by rule. Each step is preset, the GP has pre consented, and the smart contract executes the timing.
Permissionless on chain lending only has one lever: at LTV breach, sell the collateral to a liquidator. That works for ETH against ETH and fails for an LP interest where there is no market to sell into and the borrower's cash flow is invisible to the contract. Ravariant enforces against the cash flow timeline, not the price timeline. The recovery path runs through the periodic distribution stream, which a sell only engine cannot reach.
Two Oracle Architecture
Single oracle lending lives and dies on one price feed. Ravariant uses two systems in parallel. The NAV oracle ingests the administrator's reported NAV and cross checks it against ARC ratings, Preqin, and the fund factsheet before pushing on chain through a 2 of 3 multisig. The stress oracle is separate, feeding proxy baskets of correlated public assets into the dynamic margin threshold so credit and macro signals tighten the threshold for new borrowing before the next NAV report arrives.
Two fail safes the single oracle model does not have. If the administrator NAV is wrong or stale, the stress oracle catches the move. If the stress oracle drifts, the cross checked NAV anchors it. The legal backstop also remains: the GP signs a compliance certificate on the administrator's data, the same document they sign for every credit facility. Misrepresenting it carries real consequences.
Non Recourse by Default
Traditional lenders require full personal recourse because seizing an LP interest is slow and uncertain. The recourse is the real protection. When the collateral sits with a third party custodian from day one and the enforcement sequence is preset, the lender recovers through the structure, not through the borrower. That makes non recourse lending viable at smaller sizes.
Traditional vs Ravariant: Side by Side
| Traditional | Ravariant |
|---|
| Origination time | Weeks to months | Minutes |
| Legal cost per deal | $150K to $600K | Near zero marginal |
| Borrower diligence | Bespoke per deal | Reusable verified profile |
| Advance rate | Set per deal, frozen until next NAV | Set per fund template |
| Margin threshold | Set once, reviewed quarterly | Repriced continuously |
| Coupon over base rate | SOFR plus 400 to 600 bps, negotiated | Computed from template, size, threshold |
| GP relationship | Negotiated per deal, weeks of consent | Embedded at fund launch, blanket consent |
| Monitoring | Quarterly PDF, manual Excel | Continuous, automated on admin update |
| Breach detection | 2 to 4 months after the fact | Same day as admin reports |
| Enforcement | Letters, cure periods, litigation | Preset rules, custodian executes |
| Enforcement timeline | 30 to 90 days cooperative, 6 to 18 months contested | Days |
| Minimum deal size | $5M to $15M | No minimum |
| Recourse | Full personal guarantee | Non recourse, structure carries protection |
An estimated $35 billion in loans are secured annually against private equity holdings worldwide. The structural protections are well understood. The opportunity is in delivery. Ravariant runs four outputs at origination and reprices them live: advance rate, dynamic margin threshold, coupon over base rate, enforcement sequence. The template applies to every borrower in a fund, and the engine applies to every fund on the platform.