Interest Rates for Assets That Have Gates
The rate models used across existing lending protocols were built for liquid collateral that can be sold or repaid instantly. When the underlying asset has a redemption gate, the borrower cannot respond to rate signals until the next window opens. The interest model needs to follow the gate schedule, not pool utilization.
1. Different Assets Need Different Rate Models
ETH can be sold in the same block it was borrowed against. A quarterly gated fund share cannot be redeemed for 90 days, may have a lockup, and may cap how much can exit per window. These two assets sit on the same blockchains and can be wrapped in the same token standards, but they have completely different liquidity profiles. The rate model for one should not be copied to the other.
Existing rate models already handle the liquid end of this spectrum well. Utilization curves work for assets that settle instantly or daily. Bank NAV facilities work for monthly funds with stated maturities. The table below maps what exists today.
The gap is at the gated end. Assets with quarterly redemption windows, lockups, or percentage caps on how much can exit per window. The utilization curve assumes the borrower can repay at any time. The bank facility assumes covenant enforcement through counsel. Neither assumption holds when the asset itself dictates when settlement can happen.
| Asset | Redemption window | Settlement | Rate model |
|---|---|---|---|
ETH / WBTC | None | Instant (same block) | Utilization kink (Aave, Compound) |
BlackRock BUIDL | Daily | T+0 same day wire | Utilization kink (Euler) |
Midas mF ONE | Daily + queue | Instant with capacity limit | Adaptive curve (Morpho) |
Monthly fund (TradFi) | 30 days | NAV + queue | SOFR + spread (bank NAV facility) |
Quarterly gated fund | Quarterly | NAV + lockup + cap | ? |